4.7 Article

Plastic response to early shade avoidance cues has season-long effect on Beta vulgaris growth and development

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 44, 期 11, 页码 3538-3551

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.14171

关键词

environmental plasticity; light quality; weed competition; weed removal timing; yield potential

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2016-67013-24912]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture
  3. Western Sugar Cooperative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that early presence of weeds significantly reduces sugar beet growth, with implications for crop management and genetic improvement strategies. Sugar beet responds early and near-irreversibly to weed presence, affecting leaf and root biomasses.
Early-emerging weeds are known to negatively affect crop growth but the mechanisms by which weeds reduce crop yield are not fully understood. In a 4-year study, we evaluated the effect of duration of weed-reflected light on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) growth and development. The study included an early-season weed removal series and a late-season weed addition series of treatments arranged in a randomized complete block, and the study design minimized direct resource competition. If weeds were present from emergence until the two true-leaf sugar beet stage, sugar beet leaf area was reduced 22%, leaf biomass reduced 25%, and root biomass reduced 32% compared to sugar beet grown season-long without surrounding weeds. Leaf area, leaf biomass, and root biomass was similar whether weeds were removed at the two true-leaf stage (approximately 330 GDD after planting) or allowed to remain until sugar beet harvest (approximately 1,240 GDD after planting). Adding weeds at the two true-leaf stage and leaving them until harvest (similar to 1,240 GDD) reduced sugar beet leaf and root biomass by 18% and 23%, respectively. This work suggests sugar beet responds early and near-irreversibly to weed presence and has implications for crop management genetic improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据