4.7 Article

Universal stress protein-like gene from mulberry enhances abiotic stress tolerance in Escherichia coli and transgenic tobacco cells

期刊

PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 1190-1194

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/plb.13311

关键词

universal stress proteins; mulberry; abiotic stress; cellular tolerance

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [IF120808]
  2. Department of Biotechnology, Government India [BT/TDS/121/SP20276/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the MaUSP1-like gene from mulberry confers cellular level tolerance under abiotic stress, enhancing survival and growth in both bacteria and tobacco cells. It suggests that maintaining cellular level tolerance is crucial for growth under stress, and overexpression of genes like USPs can improve cellular level tolerance.
Universal stress proteins (USPs) are a conserved group of proteins initially identified and characterized in bacteria. USPs are induced under multiple stresses, and are important for stress acclimation. We cloned a USP-like gene designated as MaUSP1-like from mulberry and expressed in bacteria and tobacco to examine its relevance in abiotic stress tolerance. Escherichia coli and tobacco cells expressing MaUSP1-like gene were exposed to different abiotic stresses, and cell survival and growth was recorded to assess the stress effects. MaUSP1-like gene conferred tolerance to E. coli cells under NaCl-induced salt stress, PEG8000-induced desiccation stress, cadmium chloride-induced heavy metal stress, and heat stress. Overexpression of MaUSP1-like sustained cell division and growth in tobacco cells under salt stress. The results demonstrate that MaUSP1-like gene is capable of conferring cellular level tolerance in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems, under abiotic stress. The finding opened up an option to argue that maintenance of cellular level tolerance is crucial for sustenance of growth under stress and cellular level tolerance can be improved by overexpressing genes like USPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据