4.7 Article

Rice Non-Specific Phospholipase C6 Is Involved in Mesocotyl Elongation

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 62, 期 6, 页码 985-1000

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcab069

关键词

Mesocotyl development; Non-specific phospholipase C; Phosphocholine; Rice; SLR1

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Program from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013CB126900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270333]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that the OsNPC6 gene in rice plays a role in mesocotyl elongation by modulating the level of phosphocholine (PCho), thereby influencing plant response to gibberellic acid (GA) signaling.
Mesocotyl elongation of rice is crucial for seedlings pushing out of deep soil. The underlying mechanisms of phospholipid signaling in mesocotyl growth of rice are elusive. Here we report that the rice non-specific phospholipase C6 (OsNPC6) is involved in mesocotyl elongation. Our results indicated that all five OsNPCs (OsNPC1, OsNPC2, OsNPC3, OsNPC4 and OsNPC6) hydrolyzed the substrate phosphatidylcholine to phosphocholine (PCho), and all of them showed plasma membrane localization. Overexpression (OE) of OsNPC6 produced plants with shorter mesocotyls compared to those of Nipponbare and npc6 mutants. Although the mesocotyl growth of npc6 mutants was not much affected without gibberellic acid (GA)(3), it was obviously elongated by treatment with GA. Upon GA(3) treatment, SLENDER RICE1 (SLR1), the DELLA protein of GA signaling, was drastically increased in OE plants; by contrast, the level of SLR1 was found decreased in npc6 mutants. The GA-enhanced mesocotyl elongation and the GA-impaired SLR1 level in npc6 mutants were attenuated by the supplementation of PCho. Further analysis indicated that the GA-induced expression of phospho-base N-methyltransferase 1 in npc6 mutants was significantly weakened by the addition of PCho. In summary, our results suggest that OsNPC6 is involved in mesocotyl development via modulation of PCho in rice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据