4.7 Article

Hydrodynamic regimes and drag on horizontally pulled floating spheres

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 33, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0061768

关键词

-

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [URF/1/3723-01-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through varying the pulling force, we investigate the hydrodynamic regimes of a floating sphere on a water surface, observing transitions from low to high Froude number regimes as the force increases.
We use high-speed imaging to investigate the movement of a floating sphere pulled horizontally along a water surface. The model sphere is 10 cm in diameter and has half of the water density resulting in a half-submerged static sphere. By varying the pulling force, we investigate the flow dynamics in the subcritical Reynolds number range, of Re & AP; 2 x 10(4) to 2 x 10(5). We characterize three hydrodynamic regimes with the increase in the pulling force, to which we refer to as: low Froude number, Fr < 0.6, intermediate, 0.6 < Fr < 1.2 and high Froude number, Fr > 1.2 regimes. In the low Fr regime, the sphere moves with little disturbance of the water surface and the drag is close to half of the drag on a fully submerged sphere. In the intermediate Fr regime, a pronounced wave pattern is developed which together with the dipping of the sphere below the water level leads to an increase in the drag force. Based on a potential flow approximation for the downward force on the sphere moving along the surface, we derive a semiempirical relation for the sphere dipping as a function of the Froude number. Finally, in the high Fr regime, the sphere movement switches to a mode of periodic dipping below and surfacing above the water surface. The periodic vertical motion portrays a decrease in the average drag force. (C) 2021 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据