4.7 Article

Four lepton production in gluon fusion: Off-shell Higgs effects in NLO QCD

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 819, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136465

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_188464]
  2. Forschungskredit der Universitat Zurich, Verfugung [FK19092]
  3. ERC [714788 REINVENT]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article focuses on the production of four charged leptons in hadron collisions and computes the next-to-leading order QCD corrections to the loop-induced gluon fusion contribution while considering the Higgs boson signal, background, and interference. The calculations are implemented in the MATRIX framework and show good agreement with recent ATLAS data, providing valuable insights into constraining the Higgs boson width through off-shell measurements.
We consider the production of four charged leptons in hadron collisions and compute the next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD corrections to the loop-induced gluon fusion contribution by consistently accounting for the Higgs boson signal, its corresponding background and their interference. The contribution from heavy-quark loops is exactly included in the calculation except for the two-loop gg -> Z Z -> 4l continuum diagrams, for which the unknown heavy-quark effects are approximated through a reweighting procedure. Our calculation is combined with the next-to-next-to-leading order QCD and NLO electroweak corrections to the q (q) over bar -> 4l process, including all partonic channels and consistently accounting for spin correlations and off-shell effects. The computation is implemented in the MATRIX framework and allows us to separately study the Higgs boson signal, the background and the interference contributions, whose knowledge can be used to constrain the Higgs boson width through off-shell measurements. Our state-of-the-art predictions for the invariant-mass distribution of the four leptons are in good agreement with recent ATLAS data. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据