4.5 Article

Are flexible flat feet associated with proximal joint problems in children?

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 204-210

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.02.008

关键词

Flat foot; Kinematics; Kinetics; Ground reaction force; Symptoms

资金

  1. charity Action Medical Research [GN2019]
  2. Action Medical Research [2019] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of flexible flat feet (FF) in the development of musculoskeletal symptoms at joints proximal to the ankle is unclear. We undertook an observational study to investigate the relationship between foot posture and the proximal joints in children. It was hypothesised that reduced arch height would be associated with proximal joint symptoms and altered gait kinematics and kinetics particularly in the transverse plane at the hip and knee. Ninety-five children between the ages of 8-15 were recruited into this ethically approved study. Foot posture was classified using the arch height index (AHI). The frequency of knee and hip/back pain was documented, and each child underwent three dimensional gait analysis. Reduced arch height was associated with increased odds of knee symptoms (p < 0.01) and hip/back symptoms (p = 0.01). A flat foot posture was also significantly associated with a reduction in the second peak of the vertical ground reaction force (p = 0.03), which concomitantly affected late stance hip and knee moments. A reduced AHI was also associated with increased pelvic retraction and increased knee valgus in midstance. No kinematic and kinetic parameter associated with a flat foot posture related to increased proximal joint symptoms in the FF group. Children with a flatter foot posture are more likely to have pain or discomfort at the knee, hip and back; however, the mechanisms by which this occurs remain unclear. Treating FF without explicit understanding of how it relates to symptoms is difficult, and further work in this area is required. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据