4.8 Article

Fingerprinting Heatwaves and Cold Spells and Assessing Their Response to Climate Change Using Large Deviation Theory

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 127, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.058701

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [TRR181, 274762653, 820970]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extreme events provide insights into climate dynamics and understanding them is crucial for mitigating the impact of climate change. By applying large deviation theory to an Earth system model, researchers defined the climatology of persistent heatwaves and cold spells in key geographical regions, and assessed the impact of increased CO2 concentration on these anomalies. They also showed that high impact events in 2010 were associated with exceptional atmospheric patterns, encoded in the natural variability of the climate, proposing an approximate formula for return times of large and persistent temperature fluctuations.
Extreme events provide relevant insights into the dynamics of climate and their understanding is key for mitigating the impact of climate variability and climate change. By applying large deviation theory to a state-of-the-art Earth system model, we define the climatology of persistent heatwaves and cold spells in key target geographical regions by estimating the rate functions for the surface temperature, and we assess the impact of increasing CO2 concentration on such persistent anomalies. Hence, we can better quantify the increasing hazard due to heatwaves in a warmer climate. We show that two 2010 high impact events-summer Russian heatwave and winter Dzud in Mongolia-are associated with atmospheric patterns that are exceptional compared to the typical ones but typical compared to the climatology of extremes. Their dynamics is encoded in the natural variability of the climate. Finally, we propose and test an approximate formula for the return times of large and persistent temperature fluctuations from easily accessible statistical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据