4.5 Article

Impaired synergic control of posture in Parkinson's patients without postural instability

期刊

GAIT & POSTURE
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 209-215

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.12.035

关键词

Posture; Parkinson's disease; Synergy; Muscle mode; Anticipatory synergy adjustments

资金

  1. NIH [NS060722, ES019672, NS082151, NS035032, AR048563]
  2. Penn State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Postural instability is one of most disabling motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Indices of multi-muscle synergies are new measurements of movement and postural stability. Objectives: Multi-muscle synergies stabilizing vertical posture were studied in Parkinson's disease patients without clinical symptoms of postural instability ( Hoehn-Yahr <= II) and age-matched controls. We tested the hypothesis that both synergy indices during quiet standing and synergy adjustments to self-triggered postural perturbations would be reduced in patients. Methods: Eleven Parkinson's disease patients and 11 controls performed whole-body tasks while standing. Surface electromyography was used to quantify synergy indices stabilizing center of pressure shifts in the anterior-posterior direction during a load-release task. Results: Parkinson's disease patients showed a significantly lower percentage of variance in the muscle activation space accounted for by the first four principal components, significantly reduced synergy indices during steady state, and significantly reduced anticipatory synergy adjustments ( a drop in the synergy index prior to the self-triggered unloading). Conclusions: The study demonstrates for the first time that impaired synergic control in Parkinson's disease can be quantified in postural tasks, even in patients without clinical manifestations of postural instability. Synergy measurements may provide a biomarker sensitive for early problems with postural stability in Parkinson's disease. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据