4.8 Article

Ultrawide Temperature Range Super-Invar Behavior of R2(Fe,Co)17 Materials (R = Rare Earth)

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 127, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.055501

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22090042, 21731001, 21971009]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0406202]
  3. DOE Office of Science [DEAC02-06CH11357]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/T011130/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By adjusting the Fe-Co content, researchers have optimized the thermal expansion behavior in a family of R-2(Fe, Co)(17) materials, achieving a record-wide SIV range with good cyclic stability. This breakthrough paves the way for exploiting thermal-expansion-control engineering and related functional materials.
Super Invar (SIV), i.e., zero thermal expansion of metallic materials underpinned by magnetic ordering, is of great practical merit for a wide range of high precision engineering. However, the relatively narrow temperature window of SIV in most materials restricts its potential applications in many critical fields. Here, we demonstrate the controlled design of thermal expansion in a family of R-2(Fe, Co)(17) materials (R = rare Earth). We find that adjusting the Fe-Co content tunes the thermal expansion behavior and its optimization leads to a record-wide SIV with good cyclic stability from 3-461 K, almost twice the range of currently known SIV. In situ neutron diffraction, Mossbauer spectra and first-principles calculations reveal the 3d bonding state transition of the Fe-sublattice favors extra lattice stress upon magnetic ordering. On the other hand, Co content induces a dramatic enhancement of the internal molecular field, which can be manipulated to achieve ultrawide SIV over broad temperature, composition and magnetic field windows. These findings pave the way for exploiting thermal-expansion-control engineering and related functional materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据