4.8 Article

Novel Approach to 93mMo Isomer Depletion: Nuclear Excitation by Electron Capture in Resonant Transfer Process

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 127, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.042501

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [2017/25/B/ST2/00901]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel approach for isomer depletion in ion-atom collisions was proposed in this study, which showed a discrepancy between experimental results and theoretical descriptions for the Mo-93m isomer depletion. By taking into account the momentum distribution of target electrons and considering the Compton profile in the theoretical description, the study demonstrated the importance of these factors, particularly for the L shell where the depletion probability increased dramatically.
A novel approach for isomer depletion in ion-atom collisions is proposed and considered theoretically. Analyses are performed for the depletion of the Mo-93m isomer for which an unexpectedly large probability was measured in the beam-based experiment of Chiara et al. [Nature (London) 554, 216 (2018)]. The subsequent attempt at a theoretical description based on state-of-the-art atomic theory did not reproduce the experimental result [Wu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 212501 (2019)] and showed a dramatic disagreement with the experiment (by many orders of magnitude). This conflict calls for further research on the nature of isomer depletion mechanisms occurring in atomic processes. Here, we propose to consider the Mo-93m isomer depletion as the nuclear excitation by electron capture in resonant transfer process taking into account the momentum distribution of the target electrons. Although our results only slightly shift the upper theoretical limit for the total Mo-93m isomer depletion probability toward the experimental value, they show the importance of considering the Compton profile in the theoretical description, in particular for the L shell, for which the depletion probability increases by many orders of magnitude.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据