4.8 Article

Vortex Motion Quantifies Strong Dissipation in a Holographic Superfluid

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 127, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.101601

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU [694561]
  2. DFG [SFB 1225]
  3. Heidelberg University
  4. Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes e. V.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the motion of a vortex dipole in a two-dimensional holographic superfluid, achieving high-precision matching with the dynamics from the Gross-Pitaevskii equation. By comparing with equations describing vortex interactions in superfluids, the friction parameters of the holographic superfluid are successfully determined, indicating the potential application of holographic vortex dynamics in experimentally accessible superfluids.
Holographic duality provides a description of strongly coupled quantum systems in terms of weakly coupled gravitational theories in a higher-dimensional space. It is a challenge, however, to quantitatively determine the physical parameters of the quantum systems corresponding to generic holographic theories. Here, we address this problem for the two-dimensional holographic superfluid, known to exhibit strong dissipation. We numerically simulate the motion of a vortex dipole and perform a high-precision matching of the corresponding dynamics resulting from the dissipative Gross-Pitaevskii equation. Excellent agreement is found for the vortex core shape and the spatiotemporal trajectories. A further comparison to the Hall-Vinen-Iordanskii equations for point vortices interacting with the superfluid allows us to determine the friction parameters of the holographic superfluid. Our results suggest that holographic vortex dynamics can be applied to experimentally accessible superfluids like strongly coupled ultracold Bose gases or thin helium films with temperatures in the Kelvin range. This would make holographic far-from-equilibrium dynamics and turbulence amenable to experimental tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据