4.5 Article

Tunneling influence on the intersubband optical absorption coefficient and refraction index in biased GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well wires

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2021.114763

关键词

Semiconductor; Quantum well wire; Electric field; Intersubband transition; Tunnel effect; Absorption coefficient; Refraction index

资金

  1. El Patrimonio Autonomo Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento para la Ciencia, la Tecnologia y la Innovacion Francisco Jose de Caldas [CD 111580863338, CT FP80740-173-2019]
  2. UTA fellow-ship
  3. FONDECYT [1180905]
  4. Centers of excellence with BASAL/CONICYT [AFB180001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of tunneling effect on intersubband optical absorption and refraction in gallium arsenide quantum well wire in transverse electric field is investigated. Carrier tunneling results in broadening of electronic linewidth, especially under intense electric fields. Increase in electric field causes blue-shift in absorption peaks along with enlargement and decrease in amplitude.
We investigate the tunnel effect influence on the intersubband optical absorption and refraction in a gallium arsenide quantum well wire in transverse electric field. The quasi-stationary energy levels and escape times are obtained using the complex eigenvalue study in a two-dimensional finite element method. The linear absorption coefficient and the relative change of the refractive index are calculated according to the Fermi?s golden rule and by involving the intersubband relaxation time. Our work shows that the electronic linewidth broadening related to the carrier tunneling has a major effect on the optical absorption lines, especially for intense electric fields. Absorption peaks are blue-shifted by the increasing electric field and, at the same time, they are enlarged and decreased in amplitude. A field-invariable relaxation rate, as is assumed by many previous theoretical studies, could not be justified, even for moderate electric fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据