4.2 Article

ESR Investigations of (BaSnO3)x/(Cu, Tl) 1223 composite in the normal and superconducting state

期刊

PHASE TRANSITIONS
卷 94, 期 3-4, 页码 199-209

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01411594.2021.1931205

关键词

(Cu0; 5TI0; 51223 phase; BaSnO nanoparticles; Electron spin resonance (ESR); Pseudo gap Temperature T*

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The (BaSnO3)(x)/Cu0.5Tl0.5Ba2Ca2Cu3O10-delta superconducting composites were prepared by solid-state reaction technique, with the investigation conducted on crystalline structure and superconducting transition temperature using XRD and dc-electrical resistivity measurements. ESR measurements at different temperatures revealed a single asymmetric line dominated by Cu2+ ions. The results show that the contribution of delocalized electrons from Cu2+ ions is significant for high addition of nanoparticles, and the number of spins and activation energy were enhanced with the addition of BaSnO3.
(BaSnO3)(x)/Cu0.5Tl0.5Ba2Ca2Cu3O10-delta superconducting composites (0.00 <= x <= 1.50 wt.%) were prepared by the solid-state reaction technique. The crystalline structure and superconducting transition temperature were investigated by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and dc-electrical resistivity measurements, respectively. X-Band electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements were carried out at different temperatures 103 <= T <= 298 K. ESR spectra are dominated by a single asymmetric line corresponding to Cu2+ ions at the rhombic site. The temperature dependence of the g factors allowed the determination of the pseudo-gap onset temperature T*. The results of T* are compatible with those obtained from resistivity and thermoelectric power measurements. The contribution of delocalized electrons from Cu2+ ions in the disordered part of the impurity phases BaCuO2 and Ba2CuO3 is significant for the high addition of nanoparticles. Moreover, the number of spins N participating in ESR and the activation energy E-a were enhanced with the addition of BaSnO3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据