4.5 Article

Sex differences in the discriminative stimulus characteristics of a morphine occasion setter in rats

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173173

关键词

Drug discrimination; Occasion setter; Dose generalization; Sex differences; Opioids; Pavlovian conditioning

资金

  1. Canadian Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [RGPIN-2019-05147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that female rats were more sensitive to the stimulus effects of morphine and exhibited significant gender differences in dose generalization testing, highlighting the need to reassess the impact of drug stimuli on associative behaviors between genders.
The current study investigated whether the stimulus effects of morphine can function as a positive and negative feature in a Pavlovian occasion setting drug discrimination preparation in male and female rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to a feature positive (FP) or feature negative (FN) training group and all received intermixed morphine (3.2 mg/kg, IP) or saline injections 15 min before 20-min daily training sessions. For FP rats, on morphine sessions, each of eight 15-s white noise (WN) presentations was followed by 4-s access to sucrose (0.01 ml, 26% w/v); on saline sessions, sucrose was withheld. FN rats learned the reverse contingency. FP discrimination was acquired somewhat sooner than FN discrimination, and females, but not males, became sensitized to the locomotor effects of morphine, which did not influence conditioned responding. Rats then entered dose generalization testing. There was no sex difference in dose generalization for FN groups (ED50 1.26 for males and 1.57 for females). Yet for FP rats, the dose response curve for females was shifted to the right compared to males (ED50 0.54 for males and 1.94 for females). FP females exhibited enhanced responding at a dose higher than that of their original training. These findings reveal the need to reassess our notions of drug stimuli that guide appropriate associative behaviours from the perspective of sex differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据