4.0 Article

Use of Rituximab for persistent EBV DNAemia, and Its effect on donor-specific antibody development in pediatric renal transplant recipients: A case series

期刊

PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/petr.14113

关键词

allograft rejection; donor-specific antibodies; EBV; rituximab

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we monitored PEBV and DSA in pediatric kidney transplant patients with or without rituximab treatment. Early intervention with rituximab may reduce viral load and the risk of PTLD development, as well as slow down the development of de novo DSA and rejection while maintaining eGFR levels.
Introduction Persistent EBV DNAemia (PEBV) is associated with late-onset PTLD. The efficacy of rituximab in PEBV is not conclusive. We monitored PEBV and DSA in pediatric kidney transplant patients with or without rituximab. Methods 13 PEBV patients received standard treatment with immunosuppression reduction and valganciclovir, with or without IVIG; 5/13 were further treated with rituximab. Results All Rituximab-treated and 6/7 No-Rituximab patients were EBV seronegative at transplant and seroconverted post-transplant. Peak EBV PCR levels were lower in No-Rituximab than Rituximab patients and all No-Rituximab patients cleared PEBV after standard treatment. Additional 1-2 doses of rituximab reduced EBV PCR levels in all 5 Rituximab patients, 3 cleared PEBV. One No-Rituximab patient developed localized PLTD. None of Rituximab patients developed de novo DSA, while 4/8 No-Rituximab patients did: 2/4 had ABMR. 1/5 Rituximab and 5/8 No-Rituximab patients had acute rejection. There was no change in eGFR between pre-EBV DNAemia and follow-up in Rituximab patients, while reduction in No-Rituximab patients was found. There was no difference in graft and patient survival. Conclusions While early intervention with rituximab in pediatric patients with PEBV may reduce viral load and PTLD, we observed a slower development of de novo DSA, and rejection and maintenance of eGFR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据