4.4 Article

Association of time of first corticosteroid treatment with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants

期刊

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
卷 56, 期 10, 页码 3283-3292

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25610

关键词

CHNC; chronic lung disease; dexamethasone; hydrocortisone; prematurity

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [K08DK125735]
  2. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [K23HD091362]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [K23HL136525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among preterm infants treated with systemic corticosteroids, later initiation of treatment was associated with a higher likelihood of developing Grade 2 or 3 BPD compared to earlier treatment.
Objective To evaluate the association between the time of first systemic corticosteroid initiation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants. Study design A multi-center retrospective cohort study from January 2010 to December 2016 using the Children's Hospitals Neonatal Database and Pediatric Health Information System database was conducted. The study population included preterm infants We identified 598 corticosteroid-treated infants (median gestational age 25 weeks, median birth weight 760 g). Of these, 47% (280 of 598) were first treated at 8-21 days, 25% (148 of 598) were first treated at 22-35 days, 14% (86 of 598) were first treated at 36-49 days, and 14% (84 of 598) were first treated at >50 days. Infants first treated at 36-49 days (aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.7) and >50 days (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.04-3.3) had higher independent odds of developing Grade 2 or 3 BPD when compared to infants treated at 8-21 days after adjusting for birth characteristics, admission characteristics, center, and co-morbidities. Conclusions Among preterm infants treated with systemic corticosteroids in routine clinical practice, later initiation of treatment was associated with a higher likelihood to develop Grade 2 or 3 BPD when compared to earlier treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据