4.1 Article

Echocardiographic Parameters Predictive of Poor Outcome in Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn (PPHN): Preliminary Results

期刊

PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY
卷 42, 期 8, 页码 1848-1853

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-021-02677-z

关键词

Pulmonary hypertension; Newborn; Prognosis; Echocardiography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study was to describe echocardiographic parameters in neonates with PH and identify predictors of short-term outcome deterioration. The study found a strong link between right-to-left shunt and death. It is recommended to repeat echocardiography after basic therapeutic optimization for prognostic purposes.
The aim is to conduct a pilot study to prospectively describe echocardiographic parameters in neonates with pulmonary hypertension (PH) managed according to current recommendations and to identify those parameters that could predict worsening of short-term outcomes. All neonates less than 28 days old with a diagnosis of PH were prospectively enrolled in a tertiary care center for 1 year. Two echocardiograms were performed by a trained neonatologist. The first echocardiogram was performed at the time of diagnosis, whereas the second was performed just after basic therapeutic optimization. The cohort included 27 neonates. Mean gestational age at birth was 36.1 weeks gestational age (WGA) (SD: 4) and mean birth weight was 2658 g (SD: 907). Six neonates (22%) died before day 28, with a median age at death of 48 h (IQR [33; 89]). Although the first echocardiogram showed no difference, the second highlighted a strong link between the persistence of right-to left-shunt and death (p = 0.002). We showed a link between right-to-left shunt and a poor outcome (death or morbidity) after therapeutic optimization among premature and full-term neonates suffering from PH. We recommend repeating echocardiography after basic therapeutic optimization and for prognostic purposes, taking into account only the second examination. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据