4.5 Article

Deep learning-based apple detection using a suppression mask R-CNN

期刊

PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 206-211

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2021.04.022

关键词

Vision system; Fruit detection; Deep learning; Robotic harvesting; Image segmentation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have developed a novel deep learning-based apple detection framework called Suppression Mask R-CNN, which achieves high detection accuracy and efficiency in complex orchard environments. By collecting a comprehensive apple orchard dataset using a color camera under different lighting conditions, the framework is able to achieve a detection time of 0.25 seconds per frame and an F1 score of 0.905 on a standard desktop computer, outperforming state-of-the-art models.
Robotic apple harvesting has received much research attention in the past few years due to growing shortage and rising cost in labor. One key enabling technology towards automated harvesting is accurate and robust apple detection, which poses great challenges as a result of the complex orchard environment that involves varying lighting conditions and foliage/branch occlusions. This letter reports on the development of a novel deep learning-based apple detection framework named Suppression Mask R-CNN. Specifically, we first collect a comprehensive apple orchard dataset for Gala and Blondee apples, using a color camera, under different lighting conditions (overcast and front lighting vs. back lighting). We then develop a novel suppression Mask R-CNN for apple detection, in which a suppression branch is added to the standard Mask R-CNN to suppress non-apple features generated by the original network. Comprehensive evaluations are performed, which show that the developed suppression Mask R-CNN network outperforms state-of-the-art models with a higher F1-score of 0.905 and a detection time of 0.25 second per frame on a standard desktop computer. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据