4.5 Article

Psychometric properties of the revised Diabetes Knowledge Test using Rasch analysis

期刊

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 105, 期 4, 页码 851-857

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.013

关键词

Diabetes; Knowledge; Psychometrics; Rasch analysis

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea, Republic of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) [NRF- 2021R1A2B5B01001603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2). The results showed that the DKT2 had a poor unidimensional structure with low person reliability and separation index. Females and elderly individuals found certain items more difficult to respond to. Caution should be exercised when using the DKT2 in practice and research.
Objective: The revised Diabetes Knowledge Test (DKT2) is the instrument that is the most widely used for measuring diabetes knowledge; nevertheless, its structural validity has never been evaluated. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the DKT2.Methods: This study performed a secondary data analysis of people with diabetes recruited at university hospitals. Rasch analysis was used.Results: One item in the 14-item DKT2 measuring general diabetes knowledge exhibited a poor-fit, and so it was eliminated. The person-item map showed that items of greater difficulty need to be added to the instrument. The principal-components analysis of residuals revealed a unidimensional structure. The person reliability was 0.50, with a person separation index of 1.01. Measurement invariance was not satisfied for items 11 and 2 according to gender and age.Conclusions: The unidimensional structure of the 13-item DKT2 demonstrated poor person reliability and a low person separation index. Females and elderly persons found it more difficult to respond to items 11 and 2, respectively. Practice implications: Careful consideration is necessary when using the 13-item DKT2 in practice and research. It is recommended for future studies to add items of greater difficulty to the instrument.(c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据