4.5 Review

The role of SYT-SSX fusion gene in tumorigenesis of synovial sarcoma

期刊

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153416

关键词

Synovial sarcoma; SYT-SSX; Signaling pathway; EMT; microRNA; CSCs

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81860471, 82002846]
  2. International Cooperation Projects of Shihezi University [GJHZ201710]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synovial sarcoma is an aggressive malignancy characterized by biphasic differentiation, possibly linked to the pathognomonic t(X;18) translocation and the SYT-SSX fusion gene. Further research is needed on the pathogenic factors and treatment options for this cancer.
Synovial sarcoma (SS) is an aggressive malignancy of an unknown tissue origin that is characterized by biphasic differentiation. A possible basis of the pathogenesis of SS is pathognomonic t(X;18) (p11.2; q11.2) translocation, leading to the formation and expression of the SYT-SSX fusion gene. More than a quarter of the patients die of SS metastasis within 5 years after the diagnosis, but the pathogenic factors are unknown. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore the pathogenesis, invasion, metastasis, and clinical treatment options for SS, especially molecular-targeted drug therapy. Recent studies have shown that the SYT-SSX fusion gene associated with SS may be regulated by different signaling pathways, microRNAs, and other molecules, which may produce stem cell characteristics or promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition, resulting in SS invasion and metastasis. This review article aims to show the relationship between the SYT-SSX fusion gene and the related pathway molecules as well as other molecules involved from different perspectives, which may provide a deeper and clearer understanding of the SYT-SSX fusion gene function. Therefore, this review may provide a more innovative and broader perspective of the current research, treatment options, and prognosis assessment of SS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据