4.3 Article

Epidemiology of Neospora caninum infection in free-range chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) in north central Mexico

期刊

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 120, 期 10, 页码 3581-3586

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-021-07302-9

关键词

Neospora caninum; Chickens; Presence of antibodies; Risk factors; DNA; Mexico

资金

  1. Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico, Instituto Tecnologico El Llano Aguascalientes [SN/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the epidemiology of natural infection by N. caninum in free-range chickens in Aguascalientes, Mexico, and found that a high proportion of the population had antibodies. Grain supplementation was identified as the main risk factor for infection, with a low frequency of DNA detection.
The objective of the present study was to investigate the epidemiology of natural infection by N. caninum in free-range chickens from Aguascalientes, Mexico, through identifying the presence of antibodies, its association with certain risk factors, and estimate the frequency of parasite DNA detection in the brain. The study included 150 clinically healthy chickens from 81 small family farms distributed throughout the state, from which blood and brain samples were taken. Serum samples were processed by indirect immunofluorescence considering a dilution of 1:50 as a positive reaction, while the DNA detection was done by PCR; the association between the presence of antibodies and the potential risk factors was estimated through logistic regression. The general anti-N. caninum presence of antibodies in the studied population was 46% (69/150, CI 95% 38-54), with titers of 1:50 in 38, 1:100 in 24, and 1:200 in 7, finding positive cases in 49% of the farms and in 91% of the municipalities that integrate the state. The presence of antibodies found in the municipalities was estimated in a range of 20 to 75%. The frequency of DNA detection was 6% (9/150, CI 95% 2-11). The grain supplementation was identified as the unique risk factor for infection (OR = 2.82; 95% CI, 1.18-6.73, p < 0.019).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据