4.6 Article

Evaluation of two Plasmodium vivax sexual stage antigens as transmission-blocking vaccine candidates

期刊

PARASITES & VECTORS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04909-w

关键词

Plasmodium vivax; Transmission-blocking vaccine; Yeast expression; Direct membrane feeding assay

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health [R01AI150553, U19AI089672]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [81429004, 81760367]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examined PvPH and PvSOP26 as transmission-blocking vaccine candidates for P. vivax. Results showed that PvSOP26 significantly reduced oocyst densities, indicating its potential as a promising TBV candidate.
Background: Plasmodium vivax transmission-blocking vaccines (TBVs) are receiving increasing attention. Based on excellent transmission-blocking activities of the PbPH (PBANKA_0417200) and PbSOP26 (PBANKA_1457700) antigens in Plasmodium berghei, their orthologs in P. vivax, PVX_098655 (PvPH) and PVX_101120 (PvSOP26), were selected for the evaluation of their potential as TBVs. Methods: Fragments of PvPH (amino acids 22-304) and PvSOP26 (amino acids 30-272) were expressed in the yeast expression system. The recombinant proteins were used to immunize mice to obtain antisera. The transmission-reducing activities of these antisera were evaluated using the direct membrane feeding assay (DMFA) using Anopheles dirus mosquitoes and P. vivax clinical isolates. Results: The recombinant proteins PvPH and PvSOP26 induced robust antibody responses in mice. The DMFA showed that the anti-PvSOP26 sera significantly reduced oocyst densities by 92.0 and 84.1% in two parasite isolates, respectively, whereas the anti-PvPH sera did not show evident transmission-reducing activity. The variation in the DMFA results was unlikely due to the genetic polymorphisms of the two genes since their respective sequences were identical in the clinical P. vivax isolates. Conclusion: PvSOP26 could be a promising TBV candidate for P. vivax, which warrants further evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据