4.6 Article

Role of Plasmodium berghei ookinete surface and oocyst capsule protein, a novel oocyst capsule-associated protein, in ookinete motility

期刊

PARASITES & VECTORS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04868-2

关键词

Plasmodium berghei; Ookinete; Oocyst; Knock out parasite; Transmission block

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [17H04073, 16H05026, 19K22355]
  2. National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine [29-joint-12, 30-joint-10, 2019-joint-6]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H05026, 17H04073, 19K22355] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The knockdown of ookinete surface and oocyst capsule protein (OSCP) in the parasite reduces ookinete motility and the number of oocysts, potentially aiding in the development of a transmission-blocking tool for malaria.
Background: Plasmodium sp., which causes malaria, must first develop in mosquitoes before being transmitted. Upon ingesting infected blood, gametes form in the mosquito lumen, followed by fertilization and differentiation of the resulting zygotes into motile ookinetes. Within 24 h of blood ingestion, these ookinetes traverse mosquito epithelial cells and lodge below the midgut basal lamina, where they differentiate into sessile oocysts that are protected by a capsule. Methods: We identified an ookinete surface and oocyst capsule protein (OSCP) that is involved in ookinete motility as well as oocyst capsule formation. Results: We found that knockout of OSCP in parasite decreases ookinete gliding motility and gradually reduces the number of oocysts. On day 15 after blood ingestion, the oocyst wall was significantly thinner. Moreover, adding anti-OSCP antibodies decreased the gliding speed of wild-type ookinetes in vitro. Adding anti-OSCP antibodies to an infected blood meal also resulted in decreased oocyst formation. Conclusion: These findings may be useful for the development of a transmission-blocking tool for malaria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据