4.7 Article

Robust fuzzy structural safety assessment using mathematical programming approach

期刊

FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS
卷 293, 期 -, 页码 30-49

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2015.09.011

关键词

Collapse load; Uncertain optimization; alpha-level strategy; Fuzzy safety assessment; Fuzzy limit analysis

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP130102934, DP140101887]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a robust safety assessment for engineering structures involving fuzzy uncertainties. Uncertain applied loads and yielding capacities of structural elements are modelled as fuzzy variables with associated membership functions representing possibility distributions. Anew computation-orientated methodology, namely the alpha-level collapse assessment (alpha-level CA) approach, is developed to provide structural safety profile by constructing membership function of the structural collapse load limit accommodating fuzzy uncertainties. The proposed method firstly utilizes the alpha-level strategy to transform the fuzzy limit analysis into a series of interval limit analyses. By implementing the concept of robust and optimistic optimizations, a mathematical programming (MP) scheme is proposed to explicitly capture the upper and lower bounds of the collapse load limit at each alpha-sublevel. Subsequently, the membership function of the collapse load limit is established by using the upper and lower bounds obtained from the series of alpha-sublevel calculations. The proposed alpha-level mathematical programming scheme preserves the quality of sharpness of the bounds of collapse load limit at each a-sublevel, which consequently provides a rigorous evaluation on the fuzzy profile of the safety of engineering structures against structural collapse. Numbers of numerical examples, motivated by real-world engineering applications, have been investigated to illustrate the accuracy, efficiency and applicability of the proposed method. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据