4.4 Article

Assessing bite force estimates in extinct mammals and archosaurs using phylogenetic predictions

期刊

PALAEONTOLOGY
卷 64, 期 5, 页码 743-753

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pala.12567

关键词

bite force; dinosaur; sabre-toothed cat; phylogenetic comparative method; phylogenetic prediction; regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accuracy of bite force estimates in extinct taxa was evaluated using a Bayesian phylogenetic prediction model, which showed a 93% prediction accuracy. Biomechanically estimated bite forces for the majority of extinct taxa were accurate and informative about past ecologies.
Bite force is an ecologically important biomechanical performance measure that is informative in inferring the ecology of extinct taxa. However, biomechanical modelling to estimate bite force is associated with some level of uncertainty. Here, I assess the accuracy of bite force estimates in extinct taxa using a Bayesian phylogenetic prediction model. I first fitted a phylogenetic regression model on a training set comprising extant data. The model predicts bite force from body mass and skull width while accounting for differences owing to biting position. The posterior predictive model has a 93% prediction accuracy as evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation. I then predicted bite force in 37 species of extinct mammals and archosaurs from the posterior distribution of predictive models, generating posterior predictive distributions of null expectations given body mass, skull width and phylogenetic position. Biomechanically estimated bite forces from the literature fall within the posterior predictive distributions for all except four species of extinct taxa and are thus as accurate as predicted from body size and skull width, given the variation inherent in extant taxa and the amount of time available for variance to accrue. Biomechanical modelling remains a valuable means to estimate bite force in extinct taxa and should be reliably informative of functional performances and serve to provide insights into past ecologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据