4.6 Article

Supporting-Electrolyte-Free Anodic Oxidation of Oxamic Acids into Isocyanates: An Expedient Way to Access Ureas, Carbamates, and Thiocarbamates

期刊

ORGANIC PROCESS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 2614-2621

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.1c00112

关键词

isocyanates; electrosynthesis; urea; carbamates; phosgene-free; flow electrosynthesis; anodic decarboxylation; oxamic acids

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/S017097/1]
  2. University of Greenwich
  3. University Alliance Applied Biosciences for Health (Marie Skodowska-Curie Grant) [801604]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [PGSD3-546986-2020]
  5. Royal Society of Chemistry [M19-0357]
  6. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [801604] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This new method enables the synthesis of ureas, carbamates, and thiocarbamates in a simple and practical way, applicable to various substrates. The use of continuous electrochemical flow conditions allows for high yield synthesis, making the process easily scalable.
We report a new electrochemical supporting-electrolyte-free method for synthesizing ureas, carbamates, and thiocarbamates via the oxidation of oxamic acids. This simple, practical, and phosgene-free route includes the generation of an isocyanate intermediate in situ via anodic decarboxylation of an oxamic acid in the presence of an organic base, followed by the one-pot addition of suitable nucleophiles to afford the corresponding ureas, carbamates, and thiocarbamates. This procedure is applicable to different amines, alcohols, and thiols. Furthermore, when single-pass continuous electrochemical flow conditions were used and this reaction was run in a carbon graphite C-gr/C-gr flow cell, urea compounds could be obtained in high yields within a residence time of 6 min, unlocking access to substrates that were inaccessible under batch conditions while being easily scalable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据