4.8 Article

Escherichia coli-Derived γ-Lactams and Structurally Related Metabolites Are Produced at the Intersection of Colibactin and Fatty Acid Biosynthesis

期刊

ORGANIC LETTERS
卷 23, 期 17, 页码 6895-6899

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02461

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [2020R1F1A1073119, 2021R1C1C1011045]
  2. BK21 FOUR Project
  3. National Cancer Institute [R01CA215553]
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship program
  5. National Supercomputing Center [KSC-2020-CRE-0158]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1C1C1011045, 2020R1F1A1073119] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified 10 new metabolites related to the colibactin pathway, with the main metabolites being structurally characterized as gamma-lactam derivatives by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, shedding light on the complexity of this pathway.
Colibactin is a genotoxic hybrid polyketide-nonribosomal peptide that drives colorectal cancer initiation. While clinical data suggest colibactin genotoxicity in vivo is largely caused by the major DNA-cross-linking metabolite, the colibactin locus produces a diverse collection of metabolites with mostly unknown biological activities. Here, we describe 10 new colibactin pathway metabolites (1-10) that are dependent on its alpha-aminomalonyl-carrier protein. The most abundant metabolites, 1 and 2, were isolated and structurally characterized mainly by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to be gamma-lactam derivatives, and the remaining related structures were inferred via shared biosynthetic logic. Our proposed formation of 1-10, which is supported by stereochemical analysis, invokes cross-talk between colibactin and fatty acid biosynthesis, illuminating further the complexity of this diversity-oriented pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据