4.6 Article

Understanding asymmetric magnetoconductance in OLEDs: The effects of gradient magnetic fields

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2021.106251

关键词

Organic light-emitting diode; Magnetoconductance; Magnetoresistance; Asymmetry; Nonlinear gradient magnetic field

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. EPSRC [EP/L020114/1, EP/K004484/1, EP/P007767/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the symmetry of magnetoconductance can be broken in the presence of a nonlinear gradient magnetic field, especially in the ultra-weak magnetic field range. The asymmetry in magnetoconductance is sensitive to both the magnitude and direction of the nonlinear gradient magnetic field, and the modeled results are consistent with experimental observations. This work sheds light on the origin of asymmetric magnetoconductance and warns researchers about the potential impact of nonlinear gradient magnetic fields on magnetoconductance measurements.
Whilst symmetric forms of magnetoconductance (or magnetoresistance) in organic semiconductor devices have been widely observed and modelled over the past two decades, examples of asymmetric magnetoconductance do appear in the literature but have been largely overlooked and their origin has not been explained. Here, we demonstrate that the symmetry of the magnetoconductance can be broken in the presence of a nonlinear gradient magnetic field, especially within the ultra-weak magnetic field range (approximately -300 mu T to +300 mu T). Using a simple numerical model, we demonstrate that this asymmetry in magnetoconductance is sensitive to both the magnitude and direction of the nonlinear gradient magnetic field, and the modelled results are well matched with what has been experimentally observed. This work both explains the origin of the observed asymmetric magnetoconductance and cautions researchers about the potential effect of the nonlinear gradient magnetic fields on the magnetoconductance measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据