4.5 Article

Scaling up face masks detection with YOLO on a novel dataset

期刊

OPTIK
卷 239, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166744

关键词

Face masks detection; Deep learning; YOLO; Face masks dataset

类别

资金

  1. All India Council of Technical Education, India [8108/FDC/RPS (POLICY1/201920)]
  2. All India Council of Technical Education, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers introduced a novel dataset for face mask detection that includes a large number of images and annotations, making significant contributions to various mask classification and detection tasks. Through testing with eight variants of the YOLO algorithm on the dataset, it was found that original YOLO v4 and tiny YOLO v4 performed the best.
Face mask detection is a challenging research problem of computer vision because of the small sized area of face mask. The unavailability of proper datasets makes this problem even harder to crack. To address this bottleneck, we propose a novel face masks detection dataset consisting of 52,635 images with more than 50,000 tight bounding boxes and annotations for four different class labels namely, with masks, without masks, masks incorrectly, and mask area, which makes it a novel contribution for variety of face masks classification and detection tasks. Further, this dataset is tested with eight variants of the YOLO algorithm to determine its effectiveness. On the proposed dataset, original YOLO v4 achieved a mAP value of 71.69 % which was highest among all the original YOLO variants, tiny YOLO v4 achieved a mAP value of 57.71 % which was highest among all tiny variants. To propose new face masks detection algorithms that can perform with high accuracy in a limited computational resources environment, we selected four tiny variants of the YOLO algorithm and proposed new architectures modifications in their feature extraction networks that increased the overall performance and specifically, improved mAP by 4.12 % for tiny YOLO v3 and 2.54 % for tiny YOLO v4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据