4.5 Article

Whiteness and preference perception of white light sources: A case study at 5500 K with positive and negative Duv values

期刊

OPTIK
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166845

关键词

White lighting; Colour preference; White locus; Duv

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61505149]
  2. Young Talent Project of Wuhan City of China [2016070204010111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have identified differences in neutral loci for white lighting with correlated colour temperatures above 4000K. The Duv value could be considered as an effective indicator for color preference judgement under certain practical conditions.
Recent studies reported a series of neutral loci for white lighting, which showed significant differences when the correlated colour temperature was greater than 4000 K. Several were located above the Planckian locus while others were located below. In addition, some researchers indicated that the whiteness of lighting correlates with colour preference (i.e. visual appreciation on the colour rendition of lighting) but that conclusion is not in full accordance with certain individual results of preference or whiteness evaluation. To investigate the perceived whiteness and colour preference in a viewing cabinet, two visual experiments were carried out. The light sources adopted in both the experiments were eight sources of 5500 K, that included four with constant positive Duv values (similar to 0.004) and four having constant negative Duv values (similar to - 0.006). The illuminance levels were approximately 200 lux while the Color Rendering Index (CRI) values were in range of 85-91. The results showed that sources of negative Duvs obtained higher values of whiteness assessment and their colour rendition was preferred by observers. The findings also strengthen the opinion that, for practical conditions with a constant CCT and acceptable CRI values, the Duv value could be considered as an effective indicator for colour preference judgement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据