4.6 Article

Near-octave-spanning breathing soliton crystal in an AlN microresonator

期刊

OPTICS LETTERS
卷 46, 期 14, 页码 3436-3439

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OL.422842

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [17/NSFC/4918]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61861136001]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [17/NSFC/4918] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The generation of breathing soliton crystal in an aluminum nitride microresonator has enabled a wider spectral range and higher terahertz repetition rate, confirming high coherence. Broadband microcombs with different repetition rates were successfully realized in various microresonators of the same size, providing a reliable design strategy for dynamic control over comb line spacing.
The soliton crystal (SC) was recently discovered as an extraordinary Kerr soliton state with regularly distributed soliton pulses and enhanced comb line power spaced by multiples of the cavity free spectral ranges (FSRs), which will significantly extend the application potential of microcombs in optical clock, signal processing, and terahertz wave systems. However, the reported SC spectra are generally narrow. In this Letter, we demonstrate the generation of a breathing SC in an aluminum nitride (AlN) microresonator (FSR similar to 374 GHz), featuring a near-octave-spanning (1150-2200 nm) spectral range and a terahertz repetition rate of similar to 1.87 THz. The measured 60 fs short pulses and low intensity-noise characteristics confirm the high coherence of the breathing SC. Broadband microcombs with various repetition rates of similar to 0.75, similar to 1.12, and similar to 1.5 THz were also realized in different microresonators of the same size. The proposed scheme shows a reliable design strategy for broadband soliton generation with versatile dynamic control over the comb line spacing. Published by The Optical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据