4.6 Article

Suppression of spallation induced nanoparticles by high repetition rate femtosecond laser pulses: realization of precise laser material processing with high throughput

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 13, 页码 20545-20557

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.427168

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a mechanism to suppress nanoparticle generation during femtosecond laser processing of Invar alloy, which can be effectively inhibited by increasing the repetition rate, thereby improving productivity.
This paper reports a mechanism to suppress nanoparticle (NP) generation during femtosecond laser processing of 64FeNi alloy (Invar) to realize high precision fine metal masks. Nanoparticle redeposition during processing can reduce precision and ablation efficiency. Since Gaussian laser beams have spatially distributed fluence, NP types can vary even within a laser spot. Surface areas irradiated by the beam center with high peak fluence can be decomposed into vapor and liquid droplets by phase explosion; whereas positions irradiated by the beam edge, where fluence is close to ablation threshold, can be decomposed by stress confinement under the surface, known as spallation. Spallation characteristics were verified from target surfaces covered with exfoliation and fragments. It occurred above a certain number of pulses, indicating a significant incubation effect. Spallation induced NPs, i.e., agglomerated fragments, distort micro-hole size and shape, but were effectively suppressed by increasing repetition rate, due to increased surface temperature, i.e., heat accumulation. Suppression also occurred from direct sample heating using a hot plate. Thus, thermal energy can relax stress confinement and inhibit spallation induced NPs. Numerical simulation for heat accumulation also confirmed that suppression arises from thermal effects. Increasing repetition rate also helped to increase productivity. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据