4.6 Article

Compound Fabry-Perot interferometer for simultaneous high-pressure and high-temperature measurement

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 15, 页码 24289-24299

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.425811

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61735009, 61635006, 61975108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces and experimentally validates a sapphire-derived fiber and silica capillary-based compound Fabry-Perot interferometer for high-pressure and high-temperature sensing. Experimental results show that the FPI has a linear response to applied pressure at different temperatures, demonstrating excellent repeatability.
We have proposed and experimentally demonstrated a sapphire-derived fiber (SDF) and silica capillary-based compound Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI) for high-pressure and high-temperature sensing. The SDF owns high alumina dopant concentration core, which can generate a mullite crystallization region during an arc discharge process. The crystallization region acts as a reflective interface to form one FPI in the SDF. The other FPI contains an air cavity constructed by the silica capillary and is used for high-pressure sensing. Both gas pressure within a range from 0 MPa to 4 MPa and temperature within a range from 20 degrees C to 700 degrees C are measured. Experimental results show that the wavelength shift of the FPI versus the applied pressure is linear at each tested temperature. The pressure sensitivity is measured to be 5.19 nm/MPa at a high temperature of 700 degrees C, and the linear responses show excellent repeatability with linearity of 0.999. Meanwhile, the proposed FPI can stably function at a high temperature of 700 degrees C with a temperature sensitivity of 0.013 nm/degrees C. The proposed FPI sensor provides a promising candidate for simultaneous measurement of high pressure and high temperature in extreme conditions. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据