4.6 Article

CALIOP retrieval of droplet effective radius accounting for cloud vertical homogeneity

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 14, 页码 21921-21935

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.427022

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41627804, 41971285]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0212600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monitoring cloud droplet effective radius (re) using CALIOP shows highest accuracy for vertically homogeneous clouds, providing a basis for breakthrough insights in aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI). Global day-night maps of cloud vertical homogeneity and respective re are presented.
Monitoring cloud droplet effective radius (re) is of great significance for studying aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI). Passive satellite retrieval, e.g., MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer), requires sunlight. This requirement prompted developing re retrieval using active sensors, e.g., CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization). Given the highest sensitivity of vertically homogeneous clouds to aerosols that feed to cloud base, here CALIOP profile measurements were used for the first time to quantify cloud vertical homogeneity and estimate cloud re during both day and night. Comparison using simultaneous Aqua-MODIS measurements demonstrates that CALIOP retrieval has the highest accuracy for vertically homogeneous clouds, with R-2 (MAE, RMSE) of 0.72 (1.75 mu m, 2.25 mu m), while the accuracy is lowest for non-homogeneous clouds, with R-2 (MAE, RMSE) of 0.60 (2.90 mu m, 3.70 mu m). The improved re retrieval in vertically homogeneous clouds provides a basis for possible breakthrough insights in ACI by CALIOP since re in such clouds reflects most directly aerosol effects on cloud properties. Global day-night maps of cloud vertical homogeneity and respective re are presented. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据