4.6 Article

Generation of an optical needle beam with a laser inscribed Pancharatnam-Berry phase element under imperfect conditions

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 21, 页码 33331-33345

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.438709

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba [09.3.3-LMT-K-712-01-0167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an optical element based on the space-domain Pancharatnam-Berry phase is proposed to generate a high-power optical needle with a smooth and constant on-axis intensity profile. The implementation involves modifying bulk transparent glass material to form nanogratings, ensuring stability even under imperfect conditions. Numerical and experimental investigations are conducted to analyze the effects of misalignments in the optical schema on the generation of the optical needle.
Beams exhibiting long focal lines and small focal spot sizes are desired in a variety of applications and are called optical needles, with Bessel beams being a common example. Conical prisms are regularly used to generate Bessel beams, however, this method is usually plagued by an appearance of on-axis oscillations. In this work, we consider an optical element based on the space-domain Pancharatnam-Berry phase (PBP) to generate a high-power optical needle with a smooth and constant on-axis intensity profile. The phase in PBP elements is not introduced through optical path differences but results from the geometric phase that accompanies space-variant polarization manipulation. Our implementation is based on a type 2 modification of bulk transparent glass material, resulting in the formation of nanogratings with slow axes aligned perpendicular to the grating corrugation. We investigate both numerically and experimentally the stability of an optical needle generation under imperfect conditions. Influences of misalignments in the optical schema are investigated numerically and experimentally. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据