4.6 Article

Underwater image restoration via depth map and illumination estimation based on a single image

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 29, 期 19, 页码 29864-29886

出版社

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OE.427839

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3132019205, 3132019354]
  2. Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [20170520196]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61702074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study develops a dehazing method using a revised underwater image formation model, relying on scene depth map and color correction to eliminate color distortion for enhanced underwater image quality.
For the enhancement process of underwater images taken in various water types, previous methods employ the simple image formation model, thus obtaining poor restoration results. Recently, a revised underwater image formation model (i.e., the Akkaynak-Treibitz model) has shown better robustness in underwater image restoration, but has drawn little attention due to its complexity. Herein, we develop a dehazing method utilizing the revised model, which depends on the scene depth map and a color correction method to eliminate color distortion. Specifically, we first design an underwater image depth estimation method to create the depth map. Subsequently, according to the depth value of each pixel, the backscatter is estimated and removed by the channel based on the revised model. Furthermore, we propose a color correction approach to adjust the global color distribution of the image automatically. Our method only uses a single underwater image as input to eliminate lightwave absorption and scattering influence. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, both subjective and objective experimental results show that our approach can be applied to various real-world underwater scenes and has better contrast and color. (C) 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据