4.5 Article

Long non-coding RNA H19 regulates LASP1 expression in osteosarcoma by competitively binding to miR-29a-3p

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2021.8158

关键词

long non-coding RNA H19; microRNA-29a-3p; LIM and SH3 domain protein 1; osteosarcoma

类别

资金

  1. Research Innovation Fund of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University [2019B04, 2019B12]
  2. Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [H2017027]
  3. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2014HP027]
  4. Linyi Municipal Science and Technology Development Plan [201818015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteosarcoma, a prevalent type of bone tumor, is prone to pulmonary metastasis, leading to high relapse risk for patients. The overexpression of H19 is significantly associated with the progression of osteosarcoma, influencing tumor cell phenotype by regulating microRNA-29a-3p and LIM and SH3 domain protein 1. This study may contribute to a better understanding of osteosarcoma pathogenesis.
A prevalent type of bone tumor, osteosarcoma (OS) is prone to pulmonary metastasis, which results in a high relapse risk and poor prognosis for patients. The progression of OS is significantly associated with the expression of long non-coding (lnc)RNA H19. To the best of our knowledge, however, the exact molecular mechanism of this lncRNA has not been fully investigated. The present study verified the effect of H19 on the proliferation and invasion of osteosarcoma cells via in vivo and in vitro experiments, including Cell Counting Kit-8, western blot, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR, wound healing and Transwell assays. H19 was found to be overexpressed in OS compared with corresponding normal adjacent tissue. In addition, H19 served as a competing endogenous ncRNA targeting microRNA-29a-3p and activating LIM and SH3 domain protein 1 and modulating the OS cell phenotype. The results of the present study may improve understanding of OS pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据