4.7 Article

Free running CFD simulations to investigate ship manoeuvrability in waves

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109567

关键词

Ship manoeuvrability; Seakeeping; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); KRISO container ship (KCS); Self-propulsion; Course-keeping control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predicting ship manoeuvring characteristics in waves is challenging. Traditional methods fail to accurately consider the effect of waves, while unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computations can resolve the interactions with high accuracy.
Ship manoeuvrability is closely related to the safety of ship operation in a real seaway; therefore predicting a ship's manoeuvring characteristics is of great importance. However, estimating a ship's manoeuvring performance in waves is challenging because of the complex fluid-structure interactions between hull, rudder, propeller and waves. Traditional methods for the study of a ship's manoeuvrability in waves, based on mathematical models combined with potential flow theory, cannot accurately and effectively incorporate the effect of waves on a ship. On the other hand, unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) computations are capable of resolving the interactions between a ship and waves with high accuracy. The main objective of this study is to carry out a fully nonlinear unsteady RANS simulation to predict the manoeuvring behaviour of a KRISO Container ship (KCS) model in different wave conditions. A dynamic overset grid method was used with the purpose of resolving large ship motions and rudder movement. A course keeping and manoeuvring control module based on a feedback control system was embedded in the simulation to control rudder deflection according to standard manoeuvre mechanisms. Simulation results were compared with available experimental data and showed good agreement, which demonstrates that CFD is a reliable approach to estimate ship manoeuvrability in waves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据