4.7 Article

Experimental investigations on wave impact pressures under the deck and global wave forces and moments on offshore jacket platform for partial and full green water conditions

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 234, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109324

关键词

Offshore drilling platforms; Global wave forces and moments; Local wave impact pressures; Green water condition; Random waves; Platform orientation

资金

  1. Kuwait Foundation for Advancement of Sciences (KFAS) [PR18-15 EV-05]
  2. Kuwait Petroleum Company (KPC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that the global vertical wave force dominates under partial and full green water conditions, while the orientation of the structure to wave direction has limited effects. In zero air gap condition, the peak vertical force and peak impact pressure under the deck can be relatively high.
The wave induced dynamic pressures under the deck and the global wave forces and moments on an offshore platform model were measured for three different model orientations and for partial and full green water conditions in random wave fields of different energy levels. It is found that for partial and full green water conditions, the global vertical wave force dominates when compared to horizontal wave forces. The orientation of the structure to wave direction has some effect, only for 22.5 degrees orientation of the deck to wave direction. Shoreward maximum wave force can reach 3 times the maximum seaward wave force. For zero air gap condition, the highest value of normalized peak vertical force can reach a value of 42, which is 5 times higher than the normalized significant uplift force value. The normalized downward peak force value can reach as high as 8 for full green water condition due to the weight of overrunning water staying on the top of deck slab. For zero air gap condition, the normalized peak impact pressure under the deck can reach as high as 13.2 and 21.5 near the leading and trailing bottom side of the deck.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据