4.3 Article

Rapid dissipation of a Loop Current eddy due to interaction with a severe Gulf of Mexico hurricane

期刊

OCEAN DYNAMICS
卷 71, 期 9, 页码 911-922

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10236-021-01471-y

关键词

Hurricane; Loop Current eddy; Air-sea interaction; Gulf of Mexico; Ocean heat content

资金

  1. Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System (GCOOS)
  2. Texas A&M Department of Oceanography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates a case where a Loop Current Eddy (LCE), named Eddy Poseidon, encountered Hurricane Harvey in the Gulf of Mexico, resulting in rapid dissipation. The dissipation of Poseidon was caused by the formation of a cold wake, hurricane-induced surface currents transporting shelf water towards the eddy, and heat loss along the eddy's southern edge. Horizontal advection played a significant role in the dissipation process, with a large amount of heat being lost in the top 100-200 meters of the water column.
Loop Current Eddies (LCEs) are warm-core, anticyclonic rings that shed from the Loop Current and migrate westward providing kinetic and potential energy to the Gulf of Mexico (GoM). Typically, LCEs dissipate through interaction with the western shelf slope, other mesoscale eddies, and diapycnal mixing. Here, we explore a case where a LCE, Eddy Poseidon, encountered Hurricane Harvey in the northwest GoM in August 2017 causing its rapid dissipation. This interaction significantly reduced Poseidon's areal extent, dynamic height, heat content, and kinetic energy. Using in situ observations and numerical model output, we explore Poseidon's dissipation and show it was caused by a combination of processes. A rigorous cold wake formed along Poseidon's east, strong hurricane-induced surface currents transported shelf water towards the eddy on its north and west sides, and heat was lost throughout the water column from Poseidon's southern edge. Horizontal advection was greatest at the surface and decreased with depth-27% of heat lost from Poseidon occurred in the top 100 m and 47% from the top 200 m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据