4.5 Article

Association of changes in work due to COVID-19 pandemic with psychosocial work environment and employee health: a cohort study of 24 299 Finnish public sector employees

期刊

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 79, 期 4, 页码 233-241

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107745

关键词

environment; COVID-19; occupational health; workload; occupational stress

资金

  1. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
  2. Finnish Work Environment Fund [200335, 190424]
  3. Academy of Finland [329202, 321409, 329240]
  4. NordForsk Nordic Programme on Health and Welfare [75021]
  5. Finnish Work Environment Fund, Finland [190424]
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [329240, 321409, 329202, 329202, 329240] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Employees who worked from home during the COVID-19 pandemic had a more positive psychosocial work environment and better health outcomes compared to those who experienced work task changes and team reorganisations.
Objectives To examine the associations of COVID-19-related changes in work with perceptions of psychosocial work environment and employee health. Methods In a cohort of 24 299 Finnish public sector employees, psychosocial work environment and employee well-being were assessed twice before (2016 and 2018=reference period) and once during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. Those who reported a change (='Exposed') in work due to the pandemic (working from home, new tasks or team reorganisation) were compared with those who did not report such change (='Non-exposed'). Results After adjusting for sex, age, socioeconomic status and lifestyle risk score, working from home (44%) was associated with greater increase in worktime control (standardised mean difference (SMD)(Exposed)=0.078, 95% CI 0.066 to 0.090; SMDNon-exposed=0.025, 95% CI 0.014 to 0.036), procedural justice (SMDExposed=0.101, 95% CI 0.084 to 0.118; SMDNon-exposed=0.053, 95% CI 0.038 to 0.068), workplace social capital (SMDExposed=0.094, 95% CI 0.077 to 0.110; SMDNon-exposed=0.034, 95% CI 0.019 to 0.048), less decline in self-rated health (SMDExposed=-0.038, 95% CI -0.054 to -0.022; SMDNon-exposed=-0.081, 95% CI -0.095 to -0.067), perceived work ability (SMDExposed=-0.091, 95% CI -0.108 to -0.074; SMDNon-exposed=-0.151, 95% CI -0.167 to -0.136) and less increase in psychological distress (risk ratio (RR)(Exposed)=1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09; RRNon-exposed=1.16, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.20). New tasks (6%) were associated with greater increase in psychological distress (RRExposed=1.28, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.39; RRNon-exposed=1.10, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.12) and team reorganisation (5%) with slightly steeper decline in perceived work ability (SMDExposed=-0.151 95% CI -0.203 to -0.098; SMDNon-exposed=-0.124, 95% CI -0.136 to -0.112). Conclusion Employees who worked from home during the pandemic had more favourable psychosocial work environment and health, whereas those who were exposed to work task changes and team reorganisations experienced more adverse changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据