4.6 Article

Childhood overweight and obesity in Europe: Changes from 2007 to 2017

期刊

OBESITY REVIEWS
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/obr.13226

关键词

children; obesity; overweight; prevalence; temporal trend

资金

  1. Russian Government in the context of the WHO European Office for the Prevention and Control of NCDs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the data from COSI, the prevalence of overweight and obesity among boys and girls in Southern European countries has decreased, while it has remained stable or slightly increased in Northern and Eastern European countries. The trends for boys and girls in most countries are similar.
The Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI) routinely measures height and weight of primary school children aged 6-9 years and calculates overweight and obesity prevalence within the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region using a standard methodology. This study examines the trends in the prevalence of overweight and obesity from the first round of COSI carried out in 2007/2008 to the latest of 2015/2017 in 11 European countries in which data were collected for at least three rounds. In total 303,155 children were measured. In general, the prevalence of overweight and obesity among boys and girls decreased in countries with high prevalence (Southern Europe) and remained stable or slightly increased in Northern European and Eastern European countries included in the analysis. Among boys, the highest decrease in overweight (including obesity) was observed in Portugal (from 40.5% in 2007/2008 to 28.4 in 2015/2017) and in Greece for obesity (from 30.5% in 2009/2010 to 21.7% in 2015/2017). Lithuania recorded the strongest increase in the proportion of boys with overweight (from 24.8% to 28.5%) and obesity (from 9.4% to 12.2%). The trends were similar for boys and girls in most countries. Several countries in Europe have successfully implemented policies and interventions to counteract the increase of overweight and obesity, but there is still much to be done.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据