4.7 Review

Weight bias among health care professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

OBESITY
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 1802-1812

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/oby.23266

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Weight-biased attitudes and views held by health care professionals can negatively impact patient-provider relationships and the provision of care, with studies showing a mix of implicit and explicit weight bias among different healthcare professions. Future research needs to adopt more robust methods to assess and address weight bias in healthcare professionals.
Objective Weight-biased attitudes and views held by health care professionals can have a negative impact on the patient-provider relationship and the provision of care, but studies have found mixed results about the extent and nature of bias, which warrants a review of the evidence. Methods A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis were conducted by including studies up to January 12, 2021. Results A total of 41 studies met inclusion criteria, with 17 studies providing sufficient data to be meta-analyzed. A moderate pooled effect (standardized mean difference = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.37-0.96) showed that health care professionals demonstrate implicit weight bias. Health care professionals also report explicit weight bias on the Fat Phobia Scale, Antifat Attitudes Scale, and Attitudes Towards Obese Persons Scale. Findings show that medical doctors, nurses, dietitians, psychologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech pathologists, podiatrists, and exercise physiologists hold implicit and/or explicit weight-biased attitudes toward people with obesity. A total of 27 different outcomes were used to measure weight bias, and the overall quality of evidence was rated as very low. Conclusions Future research needs to adopt more robust research methods to improve the assessment of weight bias and to inform future interventions to address weight bias among health care professionals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据