4.5 Article

Perspectives, experiences, and opinions precepting advanced practice registered nurse students

期刊

NURSING OUTLOOK
卷 69, 期 5, 页码 913-926

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.03.018

关键词

Advanced practice registered; nurse; Preceptorship

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that APRN preceptors recognize their critical role but lack support and preparation to fully execute academic and profession strategic goals and objectives. There is a need for academic and professional ownership of APRN education at every level.
Background: Significant growth in advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) student placements for clinical practicums have forced APRN preceptors, hospitals, and clinics to restrict the volume of APRN students they can accommodate. Purpose: Describe the experiences and opinions of APRNs regarding their precepting experiences of APRN students in three main areas; placement antecedents, placement postcedents, and preceptor incentives. Methods: Quality improvement study conducted via electronic survey that contained quantitative short answer and a qualitative open-ended question of APRNs licensed in the State of REDACTED in June, 2019. Findings: A total of 757 surveys were quantitatively analyzed. Qualitative thematic analysis resulted in identifying one overarching theme, the need for shared responsibility and accountability, and six unique primary themes. Discussion: Our findings indicate that APRN preceptors recognize their critical role but lack support and preparation to fully execute academic and profession strategic goals and objectives. There is the need for academic and professional ownership of APRN education at every level. Cite this article: Lofgren, M., Dunn, H., Dirks, M., & Reyes, J. (2021, September/October). Perspectives, experiences, and opinions precepting advanced practice registered nurse students. Nurs Outlook, 69(5), 913-926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2021.03.018.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据