4.8 Article

TnpAREP and REP sequences dissemination in bacterial genomes: REP recognition determinants

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 12, 页码 6982-6995

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab524

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS, France)
  2. Agence National pour la Recherche (ANR) [MOBISING Blanc SVSE8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

REP, diverse palindromic DNA sequences found at high copy number in many bacterial genomes, have important roles in cell physiology. In vitro experiments reveal the interaction between TnpA(REP) and REPs with different structures.
REP, diverse palindromic DNA sequences found at high copy number in many bacterial genomes, have been attributed important roles in cell physiology but their dissemination mechanisms are poorly understood. They might represent non-autonomous transposable elements mobilizable by TnpA(REP), the first prokaryotic domesticated transposase associated with REP. TnpA(REP), fundamentally different from classical transposases, are members of the HuH superfamily and closely related to the transposases of the IS200/IS605 family. We previously showed that Escherichia coli TnpA(REP) processes cognate single stranded REP in vitro and that this activity requires the integrity of the REP structure, in particular imperfect palindromes interrupted by a bulge and preceded by a conserved DNA motif. A second group of REPs rather carry perfect palindromes, raising questions about how the latter are recognized by their cognate TnpA(REP) . To get insight into the importance of REP structural and sequence determinants in these two groups, we developed an in vitro activity assay coupled to a mutational analysis for three different TnpA(REP)/REP duos via a SELEX approach. We also tackled the question of how the cleavage site is selected. This study revealed that two TnpA(REP) groups have co-evolved with their cognate REPs and use different strategies to recognize their REP substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据