4.8 Article

tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 16, 页码 9077-9096

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab688

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health [R01HG006753]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01HG006753]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

tRNAscan-SE, a tool for predicting transfer RNA genes, has been widely used for over twenty years. Recent updates have greatly improved its ability to identify and classify tRNAs by creating nearly one hundred specialized isotype- and Glade-specific models.
tRNAscan-SE has been widely used for transfer RNA (tRNA) gene prediction for over twenty years, developed just as the first genomes were decoded. With the massive increase in quantity and phylogenetic diversity of genomes, the accurate detection and functional prediction of tRNAs has become more challenging. Utilizing a vastly larger training set, we created nearly one hundred specialized isotype- and Glade-specific models, greatly improving tRNAscan-SE's ability to identify and classify both typical and atypical tRNAs. We employ a new comparative multi-model strategy where predicted tRNAs are scored against a full set of isotype-specific covariance models, allowing functional prediction based on both the anticodon and the highest-scoring isotype model. Comparative model scoring has also enhanced the program's ability to detect tRNA-derived SINEs and other likely pseudogenes. For the first time, tRNAscan-SE also includes fast and highly accurate detection of mitochondria, tRNAs using newly developed models. Overall, tRNA detection sensitivity and specificity is improved for all isotypes, particularly those utilizing specialized models for selenocysteine and the three subtypes of tRNA genes encoding a CAU anticodon. These enhancements will provide researchers with more accurate and detailed tRNA annotation for a wider variety of tRNAs, and may direct attention to tRNAs with novel traits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据