4.8 Article

Structural and biochemical insight into the mechanism of dual CpG site binding and methylation by the DNMT3A DNA methyltransferase

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 14, 页码 8294-8308

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab600

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [JE 252/6, JE 252/15, TE671/4-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that DNMT3A and DNMT3A/3L preferentially co-methylate CpG sites with 6, 9, and 12 bp spacing. The interaction modes of these enzymes with DNA at different CpG site spacings were revealed, shedding light on how they overcome their structural preference for CpG sites with 12 bp spacing during methylation of natural DNA.
DNMT3A/3L heterotetramers contain two active centers binding CpG sites at 12 bp distance, however their interaction with DNA not containing this feature is unclear. Using randomized substrates, we observed preferential co-methylation of CpG sites with 6, 9 and 12 bp spacing by DNMT3A and DNMT3A/3L. Co-methylation was favored by AT bases between the 12 bp spaced CpG sites consistent with their increased bending flexibility. SFM analyses of DNMT3A/3L complexes bound to CpG sites with 12 bp spacing revealed either single heterotetramers inducing 40 degrees DNA bending as observed in the X-ray structure, or two heterotetramers bound side-by-side to the DNA yielding 80 degrees bending. SFM data of DNMT3A/3L bound to CpG sites spaced by 6 and 9 bp revealed binding of two heterotetramers and 100 degrees DNA bending. Modeling showed that for 6 bp distance between CpG sites, two DNMT3A/3L heterotetramers could bind side-by-side on the DNA similarly as for 12 bp distance, but with each CpG bound by a different heterotetramer. For 9 bp spacing our model invokes a tetramer swap of the bound DNA. These additional DNA interaction modes explain how DNMT3A and DNMT3A/3L overcome their structural preference for CpG sites with 12 bp spacing during the methylation of natural DNA. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据