4.8 Article

Mapping yeast mitotic 5′ resection at base resolution reveals the sequence and positional dependence of nucleases in vivo

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 22, 页码 12607-12621

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab597

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM120767]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study monitored the resection of the 5'-terminated strand at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) using high-throughput sequencing with molecular identifiers, revealing the roles of enzymes such as Mre11 and Exo1 in the process. Results showed a major Mre11-dependent cleavage position 60-70 bp from the DSB end and an Exo1-dependent pause point approximately 200 bp from the DSB.
Resection of the 5'-terminated strand at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is the critical regulated step in the transition to homologous recombination. Recent studies have described a multi-step model of DSB resection where endonucleolytic cleavage mediated by Mre11 and Sae2 leads to further degradation mediated by redundant pathways catalyzed by Exo1 and Sgs1/Dna2. These models have not been well tested at mitotic DSBs in vivo because most methods used to monitor resection cannot precisely map early cleavage events. Here we report resection monitoring with high-throughput sequencing using molecular identifiers, allowing exact counting of cleaved 5' ends at base resolution. Mutant strains, including exo1 Delta, mrell-H125N and exo1 Delta sgs1 Delta, revealed a major Mre11-dependent cleavage position 60-70 bp from the DSB end whose exact position depended on local sequence. They further revealed an Exo1-dependent pause point approximately 200 bp from the DSB. Suppressing resection extension in exo1 Delta sgs1 Delta yeast exposed a footprint of regions where cleavage was restricted within 119 bp of the DSB. These results provide detailed in vivo views of prevailing models of DSB resection and extend them to show the combined influence of sequence specificity and access restrictions on Mre11 and Exo1 nucleases. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据