4.8 Article

Crystal structure of parallel G-quadruplex formed by the two-repeat ALS- and FTD-related GGGGCC sequence

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 10, 页码 5881-5890

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab302

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [32071188, 21473150, 31670728]
  2. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region [16103717, 16103719, 16101120, SZSTI19SC02, SMSEGL20SC01-H, AoE/M-403-16, AoE/M-401/20]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2020A1515010034]
  4. Hong Kong Branch of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) [SMSEGL20SC01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hexanucleotide repeat expansion GGGGCC (G4C2) in the C9orf72 gene's first intron is a common genetic cause of ALS and FTD, forming toxic G-quadruplex structures. The study reveals the G-quadruplex structures of d(G4C2) and provides valuable details for developing small molecule drugs to treat neurodegenerative diseases.
The hexanucleotide repeat expansion, GGGGCC (G4C2), within the first intron of the C9orf72 gene is known to be the most common genetic cause of both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). The G4C2 repeat expansions, either DNA or RNA, are able to form G-quadruplexes which induce toxicity leading to ALS/FTD. Herein, we report a novel crystal structure of d(G4C2)(2) that self-associates to form an eight-layer parallel tetrameric G-quadruplex. Two d(G4C2)(2) associate together as a parallel dimeric G-quadruplex which folds into a tetramer via 5 '-to-5 ' arrangements. Each dimer consists of four G-tetrads connected by two CC propeller loops. Especially, the 3 '-end cytosines protrude out and form CC+center dot CC+/ CCcenter dot CC+ quadruple base pair or C center dot CC+ triple base pair stacking on the dimeric block. Our work sheds light on the G-quadruplexes adopted by d(G4C2) and yields the invaluable structural details for the development of small molecules to tackle neurodegenerative diseases, ALS and FTD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据