4.0 Article

Nutlet micromorphology of Mardin in Turkey Salvia L. (Lamiaceae) and its systematic implacations

期刊

NORDIC JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 39, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/njb.03123

关键词

Lamiaceae; micromorphology; nutlet; Salvia; SEM; surface ornamentation; systematics

资金

  1. Scientific Investigation Project to Coordinate of Mardin Artuklu University [MAU.BAP.18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nutlet morphology of nine species of Salvia have been studied by SEM, with most species having subprolate or prolate nutlets ranging in size between 3.02 and 6.47 mm in length and between 1.78 and 5.10 mm in width. Three basic types of sculpturing - colliculate, reticulate, and verrucate - can be distinguished, with the colliculate type being the most common. The systematic and biological implications of these nutlet characteristics are briefly discussed.
The nutlet (mericarp) morphology of nine species of Salvia sect. Salvia (Salvia bracteata Banks & Sol., Salvia macrochlamys Boiss. & Kotschy, Salvia suffruticosa Montbret & Aucher ex Benth., Salvia trichoclada Benth.), Hymenosphace (Salvia multicaulis Vahl), Aethiopis (Salvia montbretii Benth., Salvia palaestina Benth., Salvia syriaca L.) and Hemisphace (Salvia russellii Benth.) (Lamiaceae) has been studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and a detailed description of the nutlet morphological features of all examined taxa is provided. The basic shape of nutlets in most species is subprolate or prolate and the size ranged between 3.02 and 6.47 mm in length and between 1.78 and 5.10 mm in width. Three basic types of sculpturing can be distinguished: colliculate, reticulate and verrucate. The colliculate type is the most common among the studied species. The colliculate type is characteristic for sect. Salvia. Subsection Salvia with colliculate/slightly furrowed sculpturing is easily distinguished from the other subsections. The systematic and biological implications of the nutlet characteristics are shortly discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据